Quick note: With the Thanksgiving holiday this upcoming week, things should be pretty quiet. By midday on Tuesday, the activity in the marketplace will slow down considerably and thus the moves in the market will not be very compelling. They’ll be skewed by a lack of liquidity rather than move on real fundamental or technical reasons. (We’re referring to a lack of liquidity due to what we will be a small of players who are active in the market place, not due to any decrease in monetary stimulus from the Fed.)......With this in mind, there will be no “Weekly Top 10” next weekend. Thank you and have a GREAT Thanksgiving holiday!!!


Table of Contents:

1) Last week’s “breather” was a good set up for a further rally.

2) “Performance fear” will help if the market continues to move higher.

3) “Dynamic hedging” could also play a role in a further advance.

4) That said, there are always some items on the bearish side of the ledger.

5) The economic outlook does not bode well for the stock market in 2021.

6) Neither does the earnings this expensive market.

7) Many areas in the tech sector still look quite good.

8) The action in the bank stocks las week was quite constructive.

8a) The energy stocks could run further before long. (After a “breather”?)

9) Gold is close to testing a very important support level.

9a) Bitcoin is overbought, but that doesn’t mean it cannot rally further.

10) Somebody seems to be bearish about a Brexit deal.

11) Summary of our current stance.

Short Version:

1) The stock market played out much like we thought it would last week. It took a “breather” to work-off its overbought/over-loved condition. This should set it up nicely for a return to a rally mode...which should take stocks higher through the rest of this year and into early next year. The main catalyst for this further rally should be the Fed...who will keep the spigots open as the newest wave of the pandemic hits the U.S.

2) Therefore, we’re sticking with our 3,800 target on the S&P 500 for late Dec/early Jan. One item that should help any year-end rally is “performance fear.” When the stock market is rallying as the end of the year, most institutional investors have to keep buying matter what their longer-term opinion on the fundamentals might be at that time. Their year-end bonus (and sometimes their jobs) depend on them staying aggressively fully invested during year-end rally...and the whole thing feeds on itself.

3) Another factor that could help the market rally in the face of the new wave of the pandemic is the issue of “dynamic hedging.” When uncertainty is high, some institutional investors like to hedge their gains in a given year by using over-the-counter put options (or “collars”). Those options are not fully hedged by the broker who sold them...because they are usually well “out-of-the-money.” However, if the market rallies strongly at the end of the year, these firms become “forced buyers in a rising market”...which can fuel a larger than normal rally. (More details in the Long Version below.)

4) Even though we’re still bullish on the stock market for a further year-end rally, we’re always watching for reasons to think we could be wrong...especially with a market that is as expensive as this one. We’ve seen a couple of developments that DO concern us. One is the recent rise of bullish sentiment...and another one is some sizeable action in the VIX options. This is not enough to change our bullish short-term stance, but it’s something that we’ll continue to keep a close eye on.

5) Before we stray too far from the fundamentals, let’s review the economic outlook right now. Although we did see some more positive news on the housing front, there is little question that the rate of growth is slowing...and that the new wave of the pandemic will have a negative impact on the first half of next year. We actually believe that the net level of stimulus next year will shrink...and when you combine that with the slow-down...and it’s a good reason to think 2021 will not be a great year for the stock market.

6) Looking at earnings, even some of the more bullish estimates for next year will leave the stock market very expensive...and thus leave the market with little justification to rally in a significant way next year. When you combine that with what we think will be lower levels of stimulus on both the monetary and fiscal side of things, and it’s not something adds up to a great year for the broad market next year.

7) We continue to believe that investors should be scaling back their mega-cap tech exposure, BUT we think only a portion of it should be going to value stocks. Some of that new cash should be rotating WITHIN the tech sector. The SMH has been outperforming the S&P since September and the XLK would be doing the same if were not weighed down by AAPL. Looking at the charts of many of these “other” tech names (like QCOM, LRCX, KLAC, INTU, etc.) you can see that plenty of tech stocks are STILL doing quite well!

8) The action in the bank stocks last week was very bullish. It did take a bit of a breather at one point, but it held up VERY well in the face a lower 10yr yield and a flatter yield curve. If the KBE bank ETF can follow up its recent “double-bottom” with a nice “higher-low/higher-high” sequence, it’s going to be VERY bullish for the group on a technical basis...and lead it to attract a lot of momentum based money.

8a) The same is true for the energy stocks. They’re getting overbought on a very-short-term basis, but if the XLE & XOP can make a nice “higher-low/higher-high” sequence, it’s going to be very bullish for the energy sector as well. This will be especially true given that the sector is VERY under-owned. Institutional investors will have no choice but to flock to this group if it starts to rally more meaningfully into the end of the year.

9) While everybody was watching Bitcoin this week, gold slid lower again...and it is now close to testing the bottom line of a “descending triangle” pattern. If the yellow metal breaks below the $1,850 level in any meaningful way, it’s going to be quite bearish on a near-term basis.....We’ll also be watching the dollar. If the DXY bounces strongly off the 92 level again, it’s likely to exacerbate any decline in gold.

9a) Bitcoin saw another big rally (of 18%) last week. It has become very overbought, but it is not as overbought as it has been on a couple of other instances in the past, so it looks like it wants to rally past $20k before this leg in the rally comes to an end. We think it will then correct between 20%-30%.....BTW, we definitely do not believe it will become as euphoric as it was in 2017 before its sees its next significant correction.

10) We saw a big bet made last week in the options market last week...where an investor bet that the British Pound will fall 4% in the next month. (4% is a big move in the currency market.) Therefore, the fact that somebody is betting almost $1 million that the British currency will fall in a substantial way over the next month tells us that they are very confident in their bet. (Let’s face it, the bet will go to zero in just 4 weeks if it doesn’t work out.)....This begs the question as to whether something thinks they know that a Brexit deal is not going to get done.

11) Summary of our current stance....This past week’s “breather” in the stock market was exactly what we were looking for...and it since it helped work-off some of the very-short-term overbought condition in the stock actually raised the odds that the year-end rally that we have been calling for. We’re sticking with the 3,800 target for the S&P 500...and we believe we can reach that level despite some of the growing concerns surrounding the newest wave of the coronavirus and the lockdowns that are going with them.....HOWEVER, we believe that that when the fundamentals finally do turn up from their very low levels, they’ll merely be playing catch-up with a stock market that has been pushed well beyond a fundamentally justified level by monetary & fiscal stimulus. Therefore, any improvement in these fundamentals will not be enough to help the stock market rally much further in 2021. This will be especially true because despite the fact that there will still be lots of stimulus available, it won’t be as plentiful next year (on either the monetary or fiscal side of things).

Long Version:

1)The past week played out pretty much how we thought it the stock market took a “breather” by declining about 2% from its Monday highs to Friday’s close. The market had become overbought on a short-term basis by the end of the previous week, so it was no surprise that stocks pulled-back a bit to work-off this condition and digest the 11% gain the S&P 500 had experienced over the previous eleven. In other words, this was a normal and healthy reaction to the condition the market faced on Monday...and it should actually help the market rally into the end of the year and into early next year. (If it had kept rallying in a straight line, it would have stretched things too far...and kept the rally from continuing for more than a couple of weeks in our opinion.)

The biggest concern in the market place, of course, is the big increase in Covid cases in the U.S. and around the world...and the renewed lockdowns that are being announced and/or hinted-to by government officials due to this new “wave.” However, we actually think this development is likely to be bullish. Remember 7 or 8 years ago...when weak economic data meant that the Fed was going to provide more liquidity...and thus help the stock market rally further? Well, that is what is happening now with the coronavirus in our opinion. As the lockdowns rise, it will create a further slowdown in growth in the economy. That, in turn, will raise the odds of a pickup in stress in the credit markets before long...and the Fed has stated that they will do “whatever it takes” to prevent THAT from happening. Therefore, even though the goal of the Fed’s current QE program is not to push stock prices higher (like it was in the years following the financial crisis), their QE program will still help stocks rally for at least a while an indirect fashion (just like it did in Q4 of last year).

Back in late 2019, it was their “not QE...QE program” that was designed to offset the effects of the blow up in the repo market that autumn...and the stock market was an indirect beneficiary of that stimulus program. This year should be quite the massive QE program that started in March will remain in order to keep the credit markets stable during this new wave of the virus and new wave of shut-downs. In other words, the stock market should again be the indirect beneficiary of the concerns the Fed has about the credit we move into the end of this year and very early next year.

2) Of course, nothing ever happens exactly as it has in the it’s safe to say that the action over the last six weeks of the year will almost certainly be different than last year in some respects, but we do believe the net moves will be very similar. Therefore, we believe that a move to 3,800 on the S&P 500 is very possible (and actually quite likely) by late December/early January. In other words, even though we agree with those who say the fundamental outlook is slowing down, sometimes other factors...beyond the fundamentals...can drive markets for a period of time...and we think this is one of those periods.

There are some other factors besides Fed stimulus that could/should help the market rally further as well. The first one is “performance fear” (and we’re not talking about anything having to do with Viagra). It has to do with the investment performance of institutional investors. ALL institutional investors become short-term oriented at the end of the year. (Even the ones whose fiscal year is different than the calendar year. Most of their customers only care about the calendar year, not the investment manager’s fiscal year.)

The portfolio managers who are underperforming so far HAVE to keep buying if the market is rising at the end of the year. If they fall further behind, they’ll lose their jobs. Even the ones who are beating the market HAVE to keep buying. They want to STAY well ahead of the market...because it will mean a bigger bonus for them!......This is true even if those PM’s think that a major bear market is going to start in the 1st quarter of the following year!!! They cannot afford to miss a year-end rally no matter what is coming around the corner. They can shift their portfolios early in the next year, but raising cash at the end of a year when the market is rallying is a cardinal sin in institutional investing.

Year-end buying is never assured, so we cannot say that this kind of buying will absolutely take place. In other words, this kind of buying will only act to accelerate the rally, it won’t cause it. However, with the Fed’s liquidity spigots wide open as the newest wave of Covid-19 takes hold, we things like “performance fear” will enhance the rally even more.

3) There is another issue that has little to do with the underlying fundamentals that could fuel a further rally in the stock market over the last six weeks of the year. It’s called “dynamic hedging.” Long time readers have read our comments on this issue towards the end of some other years over the past decade.

This not something that is compelling every year, but it is when there are years when people worry about late-year declines. Most of the time, that takes place with the stock market has seen a huge rally during a year...and some investors want to hedge their gains against a late year negative surprise. This time around, however, it is possible that some investors have simply protected their gains from March...against the election results or another wave of the coronavirus.

That might sound a bit confusing, but this is what we’re trying to say. When institutional investors sometimes want to protect their gains against a late-year they go into the market place and buy over-the-counter put options on the broad market (usually on the S&P 500). With everything that has taken place this year, it would make sense that these investors would have been worried about a negative year-end surprise this year during the late summer or early fall. So we think this kind of hedging probably took place this year.

Anyway, what they do is....they go out and buy put options to protect themselves. However, many of these institutions are too big to hedge themselves in the regular listed options market. Therefore, they go to a bulge bracket firm and ask them to sell them an over-the-counter put option...or “collars.” (Another reason they go to this OTC market is so that they can leave fewer...or at least smaller...foot prints.) They tend to buy put options that are well “out of the money”...because anything close to “in-the-money” puts would be way too expensive. These institutions are merely trying to protect against a major decline. They don’t care about a mild late-year they only buy well out-of-the-money puts that are more reasonably priced.

The bulge bracket firm goes ahead and sells these institutions the put options...and then they go out and short S&P futures as a hedge. However, since the put options are so far out-of-the-money...they do not hedge their entire position! They short a portion of the full position...say 20%. (The option is SO far out-of-the-money that there is no need to hedge more than that much of the position.) They don’t short (hedge) any more UNLESS the market falls in a meaningful degree. If that happens, they short more and more as the market falls and gets closer to the “strike price” that they are fully hedged if/when the market reaches that level. This causes “forced selling” into a “down market”...which is not good at all.

HOWEVER, if the market does not decline...and instead can cause “forced buying” into a “rising market”!!! That’s right. If the market starts to rally, the bulge bracket firm is still short that original 20% hedge!!! So they have to cover that short if the market rises. If they don’t, they’ll lose more money on the short position...than they made in the commission (the premium) when they sold the put option to the institution in the first place. The traders at those firms are not there to bet against the institution. They’re merely there to collect the commission on an insurance policy (that will probably never go into effect). Therefore, if the market rallies, they will be “forced to buy into a rising market” so that they keep as much of the commission as they can. Of course, “forced buying” into a rising market is GREAT for most other investors!

We readily admit that we do not know if this kind of hedging has taken place this year to any significant degree...because we do not work at a bulge bracket firm any longer. (We also readily admit that there a many other hedging strategies that are much more complicated than the one we just described, but pretty much all of them still work on idea of “dynamic hedging”...and thus they all can have an outsized impact on the markets at the end of the year sometimes...IF the market sees an outsized move.).....Given that the VIX has been quite elevated for most of this year, there are certainly reasons that this kind of hedging was not very prevalent this year. However, when things are as uncertain as they have been this year, it’s still a good bet that at least SOME of this kind of hedging has taken place. Therefore, it could be something that helps the market rally more than the underlying fundamentals would provide for over the coming weeks.

4) As much as we believe that the stock market will rally further into the end of the year, we certainly admit that there are some reasons to be worried. First and foremost is the impact of the newest wave of the coronavirus. We’ll actually talk more about this issue...and the impact it will have on the economy in the next few bullet points, so we won’t touch on it here...except to say that we think it is more likely that this issue will have more of an impact next year. However, there is certainly a chance that the situation will deteriorate more quickly than we’re thinking...and will have a negative impact on the markets (and overwhelm the liquidity being provided by the Fed).

We’d also note that some sentiment measures are getting extended. For instance, the Investors Intelligence data shows that bullishness has reached 59.6%...with bearishness falling to just 18.2%. That 40% spread between the two is a warning flag for the markets. We usually like to see bullishness move above 60% before we send up a warning flag, but it’s certainly getting close. That said, the DSI data shows that bullishness among futures traders is still below 70%, so this is another reason to hold-off sending up a major warning signal about the issue of sentiment. However, there is no question that sentiment is starting to get it’s something we’ll have to continue to keep an eye on.

We’d also note that we saw a big pickup in the purchase of call options on the VIX. Needless to say, call options on the VIX are bearish bets on the stock market, not a bullish bet. Most of these bets were for a big rise in the VIX by January...and it was very reminiscent of what we saw last year...when a lot of VIX call buying took place during the fall months. In last year’s example, the VIX did not start rising in significant way for quite a while after these options were purchased. In some case, the positions were rolled forward until later months before the market tanked. Therefore, this might be something to worry about further into the future...than about a significant rise in the VIX over the next couple of weeks. However, when investors spend millions of dollar betting that volatility is going to jump substantially at some point over the next two months, it’s always something that makes us say hmmmmmm.

As you will read in point #9, we also saw some interesting activity in the options on the British pound last week, so this has our antenna up looking for reasons that could disrupt our bullish stance. Right now, we still think that the coronavirus will cause the Fed’s liquidity spigots to stay wide open...and that will push stocks higher over the coming weeks. However, we will be watching closely for signals will tell us that this expensive market is going to roll-over sooner than we’re expecting right now.

5) It’s ALWAYS important to look beyond the we just did in the first three bullet points this weekend, but we don’t want to overdo it either. Fundamentals ARE critically important. With this in mind, let’s look at some of the key fundamental indicators we look at on a consistent basis. On the positive side of the ledger, we got some good data from some areas last week. First of all, the data on housing starts and existing home sales were much better than was the NAHB (National Association of Home Builders) survey. The housing sector is obviously very important to the broad economy, so this was certainly good news.

However, we also got some lower-than-expected data from retail sales, the Empire manufacturing number, and jobless claims. In fact, the Citi Economic Surprise Index has fallen 75% from its July highs, so there is no question that the big increase in growth that the majority of Wall Street was looking for in Q4 is not going to come to fruition. Of course, that’s becoming more obvious due to the big increase in Covid cases and lockdowns across the globe. (How most of the mainstream economists on Wall Street didn’t see that coming a long time ago is beyond us.) Well, this is all estimates are coming down all over the street...with firms like JP Morgan not only worried about the current quarter, but they’re saying we’ll see a decline in growth during Q1 of next year!

On top of the more traditional economic indicators, we’re seeing a slow-down in the high-frequency data. As our economicst, Paul Shea, points out, mobility is showing signs of slowing. As Paul stated in his piece this week, “To identify the impact of the fall covid-19 wave, we compared the recent changes in mobility by state to the number of new cases. For each additional 30 cases per 100,000 residents (which corresponds to 100,000 more new daily cases nationally), households have reduced their movements to retail and recreational locations, groceries, and pharmacies by about 3%. They are also reducing their movement to workplaces by about 1%.”.......So there is no question that the healthcare crisis is creating more headwinds for the economy again...much like we have been saying it would for many, many months.

The retail sales data was particularly concerning...especially since several credit card issuers (like Citi and Chase) have said they’ve seen a decrease in spending recently. (We’d also note that gasoline purchases have fallen to their lowest levels since the spring...and several airlines are reporting a pickup in reservation cancellations and a slowdown in new reservations.) Therefore, if the renewed negotiations in DC between McConnell, Schumer and Pelosi don’t bear any fruit, the holiday selling season will be a disappointing one..........Not only will all of these issue have an impact on Q4 growth and earnings, it will almost certainly have a similar impact on 2021 growth & earnings (especially in the first half).

This is one of the key reasons why we are much less bullish than the consensus on the upside potential for the broad stock market for the full year next year. The stock market can ignore these fundamental issues for a while. In fact, we think they can and will continue to do just that (due to the Fed’s liquidity). However, as the vaccines and improved treatments ease the impact of the pandemic on the economy, we believe stimulus will become much less plentiful.

Therefore, since the stock market is already pricing-in the level of growth we’re likely to see...even when you include the better potential for the second half of next will make it very difficult for the stock market to rally in a significant way next year. It is just too expensive to justify a further rally of significance without an INCREASE in stimulus. Instead, although there will still be a lot of stimulus next year, it is likely to be less plentiful in 2021. THAT will not be good for the stock market.

6) Let’s look at this fundamental picture in another using the most important factor in fundamental analysis...earnings. We’re sorry, but the situation for earnings is not a good one for the stock market in matter what some pundits try to say. The consensus earnings estimate for 2021 on the S&P 500 is between $168 and $169. So right now, the stock market is trading at more than 21x those forward (2021) earnings. THAT is expensive. Needless to say, if the S&P 500 rallies to our 3,800 year-end target, that will give the market a 22.5 multiple!.....The biggest problem is that the vast majority of the time, earnings estimates FALL as we move through any given year. So we will be looking at a precarious situation in 2021 when it comes to valuations.

Of course, earnings estimates do not always fall as we move through a given year. Sometimes (very infrequently) they DO rise...and given that we should be coming out of a global pandemic next year, we could indeed see estimates move higher as we head through 2021. The problem is that we heard one estimate that says earnings could go as high as $180 (or even $185) next year. That’s great, but that would still leave us with a P/E ratio above 20x forward earnings if the market stays at/near 3600...and close to 22x forward estimates if the S&P gets to their target of 3,900. The market could rally a little more from those valuation...but a lot more??? We think not.

In other words, we don’t buy the argument that earnings can be a legitimate “driver” for a higher stock market next year. Earnings growth is going to have to be A LOT more powerful than $180-$185 to give the stock market a legitimate reason to rally in a meaningful way next year. Of course, then again, we can see further “multiple expansion”...but that term is merely something that gives perma bulls a reason to say that it’s okay that the market has become more expensive. Besides, even though interest rates are VERY low on an historical basis, they’re still higher than they have been for all but two months of this year.....It’s hard for a stock market to rally in a substantial way on “multiple expansion” when it’s already very expensive on an historical basis.

This all goes back to what we’ve been saying for a while now. The stock market has already priced-in the growth in earnings we are likely to get next year. The market has done this though the artificial stimulus provided by the Fed and the government. In other words, the fundamentals are merely playing catch-up with the huge rally that has already taken place in the stock market! The fundamentals are still behind the price of the stock market, so they won’t be able to fuel a further rally in stocks from current levels (or where they’re likely to end the year). At best, they’ll merely continue to play catch-up to a stagnant stock market in 2021.

7)We want to reiterate our view on the tech sector. We continue to believe that rotating out of some of one’s exposure to the mega-cap tech names is a good idea. We also believe that rotating towards some of the value groups/stocks is a good idea. However we ALSO believe that rotating WITHIN the tech sector is something investors should be doing as they set themselves up for 2021 as well.

There is no question that the mega-cap tech stocks have underperformed the broad market since the September highs. They fell further during the September swoon...and have not retraced as much of their losses in the gain from the late September lows. However, most of the rest of the tech area has done quite well. This is especially true for the chip the SMH semiconductor ETF has outperformed the S&P quite nicely. (The SMH is up 9.5% from its September highs vs. a flat S&P 500...and its up 22% from its September lows vs. a 10% gain for the SPX from its own September lows.)

Therefore, the action in the semis has been better than the SPX, but it has been FAR better vs. the mega-cap FAANG stocks (much better). Looking at an equal weighted index of the FAANGs, they still stand more than 10% below its late August/early September highs (vs. a 9% move above its September highs for the SMH)! So these mega-cap tech names are still feeling the effects of their much deeper (-18%) decline during September.

We’d also note that the broad XLK tech ETF has been acting better than the FAANGs. No, it is not above its September the SMH is...but that’s because AAPL is more than 23% of the XLK. AAPL still stands almost 12% below its September highs, so that is holding back the XLK. If it was not for AAPL’s outsized weighting, the XLK would be doing much better...and this shows that many other tech names are acting quite well.....Just look at Accenture (ACN). It has rallied almost 14% over just the past three weeks...and is now close to testing its all time highs. The stock made a “double-bottom” in September & October, so if it can follow that up with a “higher-high,” it’s going to be very bullish for the ACN.

What we’re saying is that investors need to avoid throwing the baby out with the bathwater when they are thinking about “rotating” their exposure within the stock market. Tech is FAR FROM dead...and investors should definitely be using some of any proceeds they garner from the sale of a portion of their mega-cap tech move the money WITHIN the tech sector.

8) Like we just said, we DO think investors should rotate some of their holdings towards the value plays...but which ones? Well, the action in the bank stocks was FABULOUS last week! Yes, the did see a mild decline, but like it was with the broad market, this is exactly what the bank group needed to do after its HUGE 40% rally from late September. It had become overbought, so it need to work-off some of that condition...and thus last week’s action was normal and healthy. However, the KBE bank ETF actually had a positive week last week!!! That’s right, despite the decline in long-term interest rates and flattening of the yield curve, the KBE rallied slightly last week. (It did fall a bit late in the week, but it still finished the week with a gain.) The 2.2% decline over the last three days of last week qualifies as a “breather”, so we liked the action we saw overall last week. The fact that the group was able to hold up nicely in the face of the moves in the Treasury market is VERY impressive...and it tells us that the demand side of the supply/demand equation for the bank group is FINALLY changing with investors.

On a technical basis, the KBE made a nice “double-bottom” at the 29 level (from both May and September)...and it has now moved above its June highs. This is a VERY bullish development. Therefore, if the KBE can bounce-back and takeout its November highs after it works-off a bit more of its very-short-term overbought condition, it’s going to give it A LOT of upside momentum!!! There is A LOT of momentum based strategies in the market place right now, so if/when the KBE makes a more meaningful “higher-high” in the coming days and weeks...following a recent “double-bottom”’s going to attract a lot of that momentum money (that continues to come out of the mega cap tech stocks).

8a) The other group that has badly underperformed for quite some time (and by a more amount) is the energy sector. In fact, as we highlighted about a month ago that the last time many of the energy stocks were trading at their current levels, WTI crude oil was trading way down near $20. Those stocks have rallied very nicely since then...with a rallies of about 30% in both in the XLE and XLO energy ETFs since late October. In fact, this was one group that did not take a “breather” last the XLE jumped more than 5%.

Therefore, we could/should see the group take its own “breather” going forward (even if the broad rally bounces back). However, if the this group acts well during any pullback or breather...much like the bank stocks have this past’s going to be VERY bullish for the sector. In other words, if it sees a mild pull-back...with a nice “higher-low” that is followed by a break above this week’s highs (which would also take the XLE above its 200 DMA for the first time since January, it’s going to give the energy stocks some powerful momentum going into the end of the year.

Remember, the energy sector is ridiculously under-owned by institutions!!! If the energy sector starts to run...they will have NO CHOICE but to jump on the band wagon. When a lagging/under-owned group plays catch-up at the end of a year, it can wreak havoc on institutional performance. Therefore, they will have to jump on the train as it leaves the station. This (along with the momentum based algos) will take the group a lot higher than anybody thinks is possible.

The same will be true in early 2021. If ANY group is rallying strongly at the beginning of the year (especially if it is coming off of a year-end rally) many institutional investors have no choice but to buy the group...especially if they’re underweighted in the sector. These players do not want fall behind in terms of performance right out of the gate...and spend the rest of the year playing catch-up. Therefore, this could certainly happen with the energy sector in January.

Who would have thought that the energy stocks would be doing so well after a Biden victory??? Well, we guess that we ALL should have expected something like this. Hell, it is 2020...and things like this seem to happen EVERY months (sometimes multiple times a month)!!!

9) Gold has not been getting much attention recently. (Although it did start to get some after we highlighted it in our morning piece on Thursday...when we said that it was testing key support.) Many, most people have been focused on Bitcoin this week (and understandably so), but gold has been sliding lower recently. More importantly, as we just said, the yellow metal is now very close to testing a key support level. We’re talking about the lower line of a “descending triangle” pattern. As the charts below show, that line comes in at the $1,850 level. Since gold has already broken well below its trend-line from March, any move to an important “lower-low” (below that “descending triangle” pattern), is going to be quite bearish for the yellow metal...probably for the rest of this year.

We remain bullish on gold on a long-term basis, but traders and investors need to know that if (repeat, IF) it breaks below $1,850 in any meaningful way, gold is almost certainly going to see a quick decline down to its 200 DMA (below $1,800). In other words, we’re not looking for a major bear market in gold if it cannot hold its key support level. However it should fall solidly into correction territory if it cannot hold $1,850...and fall below $1,800...before it regains its footing (and its long-term bull market).

We’ll finish by saying that the most recent decline in gold has not coincided with a rally in the dollar. However, if the DXY dollar index can hold the 92 level again and bounce it has on many other occasions over the past four’s going to exacerbate any decline for gold. Therefore, we will continue to watch the currency markets quite closely over the coming days and weeks.

9a) We certainly got a lot of questions on Bitcoin last week, so we want to review the chart on this asset class. There is no question that that Bitcoin is getting extremely overbought. However, there is also no question that it has become more overbought on a couple of occasions in the past. For instance, as we write this weekend, the weekly RSI on the cryptocurrency is above 85. That’s a much higher level than it reached at the June 2019 highs...when it topped out just above 80. However, it did reach 90 on two occasions in 2017....and in 2013, it reached 96 once...and 99 another time!

The odds of the RSI chart reaching those 2013 levels again are incredibly low, but given the momentum Bitcoin is experiencing right now, it could certainly keep rallying until its weekly RSI reached 90. Therefore, we would not be surprised if the cryptocurrency rallied further...and exceeded $20,000 before this leg of its rally leg ended and a correction began.

Having said this, the bullishness in this asset class is certainly reaching very high levels once again. Maybe the thing that scares us the most about Bitcoin is multiple notes we saw last week that said that investors don’t have to worry about a near-term top right now...because we’re not seeing the huge euphoria that we saw in late 2017.

Well, it’s true that the euphoria is not as strong as it was three years ago, but it definitely worries us that so many people seem to think that Bitcoin cannot correct in any significant way until or unless it reaches a similar state of eurphoria. THAT is dangerous...and it reminds us of what so many tech analysts and strategist said over this past summer about the tech stocks...when they said that the tech group was not as overbought as it was in 1999/2000. Those pundits were absolutely correct that the tech group was not as extended as it was 20 years ago , but that did not keep the FAANG stocks from dropping about 20% in just one month in September. (The same thing was said in January of this year about the tech stocks...and yet that didn’t keep many of them from dropping more than 30% in the second half of Q1 either.)

Don’t get us wrong, we are NOT looking for another 80% decline in Bitcoin in 2021. Again we DO agree that there is not the kind of euphoria for Bitcoin right now compared to 2017, but that only means that it’s not likely (at all) to fall 80% in its next significant decline. However, a 20%-30% decline IS quite likely at some point over the next few months (and A LOT more likely than most of the Bitcoin bulls think it is).....It just doesn’t look like it’s going to come immediately.

10) Brexit has taken a back seat in most investors minds on this side of the pond recently...given everything else that has been going on. It was interesting to note, however, that somebody made a good sized bet in the options market last week. It was a bet that the British pound is going to fall in a meaningful way over the next month. This investor bought over 24,000 December $123 put options on the FXB British Pound ETF on Thursday. Therefore, they spent over $825,000 to bet that Great Britain’s currency would fall down to its September lows in the next month. That’s more than a 4% drop...which is a pretty darn big drop in the currency market.

In other words, it looks like somebody is quite confident that a Brexit deal is not going to get done. This WAS a directional trade. We cannot see any offsetting trade that will make it look like something other than a directional bet.....We’d also note that it doesn’t matter if the bet was made by a hedge fund with big pockets. Some might think that $825k is not huge money for some hedge funds, but we’re sorry, experience tells us that nobody makes a bet of that kind of size (close to $1 million dollars)...that will go to ZERO if their trade doesn’t workout...unless they know something (or at least think they know something).

Therefore, investors will need to keep a close eye on the negotiations between the UK and Europe. If we get “no deal” could/should cause some problems for stock markets around the globe...especially for countries on the other side of the Atlantic Ocean.

This is another reason to think we could be wrong with our bullish stance on the stock market for a year-end rally. No, it’s not enough to alter our stance at all, but when the U.S. stock market is as expensive as it is right now, it is vitally important that we look for developments that might suddenly upset the apple cart. A “no deal” for Brexit would certainly qualify in this category.

11) Summary of our current stance.........This past week’s “breather” in the stock market was exactly what we were looking for...and it since it helped work-off some of the very-short-term overbought condition in the stock actually raised the odds that the year-end rally that we have been calling for will continue...and could/should even bleed into early 2021. We’re sticking with the 3,800 target for the S&P 500 we discussed a couple of weeks ago and we believe we can reach that level despite some of the growing concerns surrounding the newest wave of the coronavirus and the lockdowns that are going with (and will go with) them.

The slow-down in growth we’re starting to see due to the healthcare crisis is something we’ve been expected since the early-to-mid months of this past summer. However, this situation is one of the key reasons why we’re bullish...because it will keep the Fed’s foot on the liquidity/stimulus accelerator over the coming weeks. As we’ve said many times since last spring, the Fed’s number one goal right now is not to push asset prices higher. It’s to keep the credit markets stable...but they liquidity they provide to achieve that goal should help the stock market as well......Or course, since this is 2020, anything can happen. Therefore we’ll be watching for signals that point to and end to the year-end rally sooner than we’re expecting, but right now we think the line of least resistance is definitely higher over the next month or two.

Having said this, the problems that a rearing their heads right now should indeed cause some complications for the stock market eventually. Once we move forward into the New Year, these issue should indeed cause some pain in the markets. The stock market is already expensive at these levels, so if we’re right about a further rally this year, it’s going to make it even more expensive. The only way that the stock market will see a substantial advance next year...that is justified by the if the economic growth and earnings growth is WELL above even the most bullish estimates for next year.

We do not think that it is likely that we’ll get a big enough increase in growth in either of these areas at all...given the residual effects of the well as the massive level of corporate debt in the U.S. today. (It was already being called a corporate debt bubble a year ago at this time...BEFORE the issuance of corporate bonds exploded to what is expected to be $2.5 trillion this year in the U.S....and BEFORE the number of zombie companies who are only generating enough cash to pay the interest on their debts grew by a whopping more than 200 this year.) In other words, it’s great that the U.S. consumer has worked on shrinking their balance sheets, but the fact that U.S. corporations did the exact opposite this year will make it tough to grow earnings in significant way for quite some time.

Don’t get us wrong, there will be SOME stimulus to offset these problems. However, we believe that once we get past this year’s cold weather...and the vaccines become more available and the treatments get even better...the Fed will pull-in its horns on monetary stimulus a bit. They do not want to push the stock market so high that it creates the kind of bubble that will push things out of their control......As for the new Administration, they will back-end most of any new fiscal stimulus to the second half of their administration. (Like it or not, it’s the smart thing to do....unless we have some other major crisis on our hands once again.)

Given the divergence between our short-term view (next few months) and our longer-term view (the next 12-14 months), we think that investors should take advantage of the upcoming rally and stay invested (by rotated within the tech group...and adding to banks and energy)....BUT they should also be on the lookout for any important warning signs. At some point next year, we’re going to get another deep correction in the stock market. So as we move into the New Year, investors will need to think about raising cash and executing some defensive strategies.

We’ll finish our thought about 2021 by saying the following: The last two times a new Administration took office, the market rallied strongly. However, the first one (Obama) came after a HUGE decline of 50%...which left the market VERY cheap and VERY oversold...and a HUGE increase in monetary stimulus was just kicking-in.....The second one (Trump) came after he front-end loaded his stimulus...and after the market has done very little over the previous three months. (The S&P 500 had actually lost 1.5% leading into Election Day 2016. So although the market was not down and out like it was in 2009, it was not overbought at all...and it was trading at 17x forward earnings vs. the 21x forward earnings it’s trading at today.)

In other words, the new Administration will not have the benefit of a great “starting point” like Presidents Obama and Trump had. In fact, it looks a lot more like starting point that President George W. Bush’s had to face. (Okay, that’s an exaggeration, but the starting point for Mr. Trump was still cheaper and less overbought on a long-term basis than Mr. Biden will be facing.) That certainly does not mean that President Elect Biden will have rough first administration. We’re merely saying that the starting point will make it tough for him to have a good “first year.”.....However, if President Elect Biden back-end loads his policies (like George W did...and like President’s Reagan and Clinton did), he should be fine four years from now when he (or VP Elect Harris) is running for re-election.

Matthew J. Maley

Managing Director

Chief Market Strategist

Miller Tabak + Co., LLC

Founder, The Maley Report

275 Grove St. Suite 2-400

Newton, MA 02466


Although the information contained in this report (not including disclosures contained herein) has been obtained from sources we believe to be reliable, the accuracy and completeness of such information and the opinions expressed herein cannot be guaranteed. This report is for informational purposes only and under no circumstances is it to be construed as an offer to sell, or a solicitation to buy, any security. Any recommendation contained in this report may not be appropriate for all investors. Trading options is not suitable for all investors and may involve risk of loss. Additional information is available upon request or by contacting us at Miller Tabak + Co., LLC, 200 Park Ave. Suite 1700, New York, NY 10166.

Posted to The Maley Report on Nov 22, 2020 — 10:11 AM
Comments ({[comments.length]})
Sort By:
Loading Comments
No comments. Break the ice and be the first!
Error loading comments Click here to retry
No comments found matching this filter
Want to add a comment? Take me to the new comment box!